Model results are provided for different water quality indicators from IOW’s western Baltic Sea model covering the region 9.4-17.3°E and 53.6-57°N with a horizontal resolution of approx. 600m. The model results show near-surface concentrations of Winter-DIN, Winter-DIP and Summer-chlorophyll (using May to September), as well as the annual number of hypoxic and anoxic days from the deepest layer for 2010 to 2022. These variables were chosen as they are used water quality indicators by EU-MSFD Descriptor 5 (eutrophication). They are from a model simulation using GETM, to which the biogeochemical model ERGOM was coupled via FABM and are part of the DAM project PrimePrevention (https://www.marextreme.de/primeprevention). The provided experiment supports the analysis of already occurred extreme events, helps to identify cascade effects and assesses how biological hazards (like algae blooms or oxygen deficiency events) got impacted by extreme events.
Friedland, René (2026). GETM-FABM-ERGOM model results for selected water quality indicators in the western Baltic Sea. World Data Center for Climate (WDCC) at DKRZ. https://doi.org/10.26050/WDCC/GFEWBS
SQA - Scientific Quality Assurance 'approved by author'
Result Date
2026-05-29
Technical Quality Assurance (TQA)
TQA - Technical Quality Assurance 'approved by WDCC'
Description
1. Number of data sets is correct and > 0: passed; 2. Size of every data set is > 0: passed; 3. The data sets and corresponding metadata are accessible: passed; 4. The data sizes are controlled and correct: passed; 5. The spatial-temporal coverage description (metadata) is consistent to the data: passed; 6. The format is correct: passed; 7. Variable description and data are consistent: passed
Method
WDCC-TQA checklist
Method Description
Checks performed by WDCC. The list of TQA metrics are documented in the 'WDCC User Guide for Data Publication' Chapter 8.1.1
[1] DOINeumann, Thomas; Fennel, Wolfgang; Kremp, Christine. (2002). Experimental simulations with an ecosystem model of the Baltic Sea: A nutrient load reduction experiment. doi:10.1029/2001gb001450
[3] DOIGräwe, Ulf; Holtermann, Peter; Klingbeil, Knut; Burchard, Hans. (2015). Advantages of vertically adaptive coordinates in numerical models of stratified shelf seas. doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.05.008
[4] DOINeumann, Thomas; Koponen, Sampsa; Attila, Jenni; Brockmann, Carsten; Kallio, Kari; Kervinen, Mikko; Mazeran, Constant; Müller, Dagmar; Philipson, Petra; Thulin, Susanne; Väkevä, Sakari; Ylöstalo, Pasi. (2021). Optical model for the Baltic Sea with an explicit CDOM state variable: a case study with Model ERGOM (version 1.2). doi:10.5194/gmd-14-5049-2021
[5] DOINeumann, Thomas; Radtke, Hagen; Cahill, Bronwyn; Schmidt, Martin; Rehder, Gregor. (2022). Non-Redfieldian carbon model for the Baltic Sea (ERGOM version 1.2) – implementation and budget estimates. doi:10.5194/gmd-15-8473-2022